I'm thinking about the discrete use of nuclear bombs. It is 76 years since the last show. Technology has improved since that time. It is time to try one again.
It would be best to choose a high population density area, perhaps Bangladesh. You discharge a determined amount of explosives and then send a group of well protected researchers to investigate. The teem must be well protected because intimate contact with nuclear victims should be strictly controlled.
Why Bangladesh, and not an other high population density area such as New York city? The answer is evident, no respectable geographer would liked to be smeared with the accusation of being acomplist of genocide orientated individuals. For this role could be filled by an accountant, one who can clinically calculate the net worth of people on the basis of square kilometre. The beauty of this kind of evaluation is it would dove tale so neatly with Biden's human rights concerns. There is a measurement could be called the "I'm sorry measurement". It s how many cubic millimetres can be compacted into a heart felt apology? I'm not an expert here but it is my guess that a square kilometre of deaths in Bangladesh would be more quickly be accepted as necessary collateral death than the same "I'm sorry" platitudes in NYC.
Right now we are at the point of a nuclear war but such a war should not be tried until we can actually calculate the net worth of humanity.
American human rights concerns are emotionality inspirational. Before Biden sprouts off touching platitudes about the unfortunate deaths per square kilometre, for example in Moscow he should consider the same measurement on the basis of net worth of humanity in Nizhni Tagil or Chilyabinsk.
The destruction of humanity should be done humanely. We do not want negative holocaust fallout. Nuclear destruction is so much more humaine than gas and it doesn't have the same bad press issues. It is cleaner burning too.